Birmingham City Council faces outrage over controversial data center vote: ‘No one was paid for this’

{ "sections": [ "

Birmingham City Council members are addressing significant community backlash following a high-stakes vote that finalized new regulations for data centers across the city.

", "

In a marathon session on Tuesday, the council voted 6-3 to pass the data center ordinance. The decision came after a nearly five-hour meeting, where residents and advocates lined up to voice their frustrations during a lengthy public comment period.

", "

New Regulatory Framework

", "

The ordinance establishes 20 specific conditions for hyperscale data centers—facilities often scrutinized for their massive scale and resource intensity. The new policy also creates a tiered regulatory system for three other types of data centers, with requirements scaled based on size and electrical power consumption.

", "

Six members supported the move: Brian Gunn, Crystal Smitherman, Josh Vasa, Hunter Williams, Clinton Woods, and LaTonya Tate. Council President Wardine Alexander joined Darrell O’Quinn and Sonja Smith in voting against the measure.

", "

Pushing Back Against Accusations

", "

Council Member Crystal Smitherman took to social media to push back against claims of impropriety regarding the vote. Addressing concerns about the outcome, she emphasized that the ordinance remains open for future amendments.

", "

\"There wasn’t any way to make anyone happy but not passing an ordinance in place would’ve been harmful,\" Smitherman stated in a Facebook post. \"Lastly, no one was paid for this. C’mon now. If you can provide it with receipts it’ll be news to me.\"

", "

Path Forward

", "

These updated zoning policies apply to all future and expanding projects within Birmingham. Once the city’s six-month moratorium concludes, developers will be able to resume submitting applications under this new framework.

", "

In an op-ed published by 205focus.com, Council Member Josh Vasa argued that establishing a regulatory baseline was critical to avoiding an unchecked landscape. \"In my view, having a regulatory framework in place—even one that can be improved—was better than leaving those gaps unaddressed,\" Vasa said. \"Simply put, some regulation was better than no regulation.\"

", "

Vasa noted that amending the ordinance during Tuesday's meeting would have triggered a four-week delay, potentially allowing existing projects to move forward without any new oversight. \"The ordinance is a starting point, not an ending point,\" he added.

", "

Clarifying Current Projects

", "

City officials have clarified that Tuesday's vote is separate from the multibillion-dollar AI factory development in Oxmoor Valley. That site remains exempt from both the moratorium and these new rules, unless Nebius expands its current scope.

", "

City leadership has emphasized that they cannot interfere with established permitting processes, even as the Oxmoor Valley project faces an ongoing lawsuit from local homeowners.

", "

Council President Wardine Alexander shared her perspective on Facebook, explaining that she initially learned of the project's scope only after it was well underway. She reiterated her support for innovation, provided it is coupled with transparency. \"I support economic development, innovation, and job creation,\" Alexander said. \"But I also believe projects of this magnitude require transparency, community engagement, and strong oversight.\""

" ] }