US military says it carried out ‘self-defense’ strikes in Iran, including on missile launch sites
The U.S. military said Monday that it carried out “self-defense” strikes in southern Iran, including on missile launch sites and boats placing mines, even as President Donald Trump said on social media that negotiations were “proceeding nicely.”
The U.S. military confirmed on Monday that it conducted a series of self-defense strikes within southern Iran. The operation targeted specific infrastructure, including missile launch sites and vessels actively engaged in mining operations. Despite this kinetic action, President Donald Trump took to social media to signal that high-stakes negotiations remain on track, describing the diplomatic progress as “proceeding nicely.”
Operational Context and Diplomacy
According to Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for U.S. Central Command, these strikes were authorized specifically to neutralize threats against U.S. troops. Hawkins emphasized that the military is maintaining a posture of restraint while a ceasefire remains in effect.
While details regarding the immediate tactical threats remain thin, the strikes underscore the delicate nature of current talks. President Trump has recently outlined a bold vision for the potential agreement, suggesting it should mandate that several regional powers join the Abraham Accords. These original, U.S.-brokered agreements from the President’s first term serve as the primary framework for normalizing regional relations with Israel, an ongoing effort that has not been without significant geopolitical friction.
Strategic Hurdles
The push for an expanded accord faces immediate headwinds. The emerging deal has faced criticism from conservative corners, with some Republicans demanding a more uncompromising stance toward Tehran.
Trump’s wish list for expansion includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan. However, regional heavyweights like Saudi Arabia maintain that any normalization requires a concrete path toward Palestinian statehood—a stance shared by Pakistan. Analysts in Islamabad have noted that despite the President's public push, Pakistan’s fundamental position regarding Israel remains unchanged.
The Future of the Accords
Despite the complexity, officials remain engaged in the process. Former U.S. Ambassador Masood Khan acknowledged that while the inclusion of the Abraham Accords was not originally on the negotiation agenda, the diplomatic track persists. The accords, which first gained traction in 2020 through Bahrain and the UAE, have since expanded to include nations such as Kazakhstan.
Trump has suggested that, should a deal be finalized, even Iran could theoretically become a party to the accords. Whether that becomes a reality remains to be seen as the U.S. continues to balance military deterrence with high-level diplomacy.